April 15, 2026 Webinar Evaluation – Crossing Borders: Immigration Issues in Family Law Practice

Presented by Linda Bortell Psy.D. | Faith Nouri, JD. | Merlyn Hernandez, CFLS

Responses are confidential and your name/answers are not published. By entering your name below you are certifying that you personally attended the session.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Required for Credit/Optional otherwise

Email - Only used for tracking; responses are confidential *

Professional Designation, e.g. JD, LCSW, PH.D. LMFT, etc.)

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following: After completing this session, I am able to:

	1-= Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5 - Strongly Agree
assess the immigration crossover issues in family law cases	1-= Strongly Disagreeassess the immigration crossover issues in family law cases 1-= Strongly Disagree	2assess the immigration crossover issues in family law cases 2	3assess the immigration crossover issues in family law cases 3	4assess the immigration crossover issues in family law cases 4	5 - Strongly Agreeassess the immigration crossover issues in family law cases 5 - Strongly Agree
select options for families facing immigration issues in family law cases and resources available	1-= Strongly Disagreeselect options for families facing immigration issues in family law cases and resources available 1-= Strongly Disagree	2select options for families facing immigration issues in family law cases and resources available 2	3select options for families facing immigration issues in family law cases and resources available 3	4select options for families facing immigration issues in family law cases and resources available 4	5 - Strongly Agreeselect options for families facing immigration issues in family law cases and resources available 5 - Strongly Agree
identify situations in which the immunity standards presented may require further consideration in my practice	1-= Strongly Disagreeidentify situations in which the immunity standards presented may require further consideration in my practice 1-= Strongly Disagree	2identify situations in which the immunity standards presented may require further consideration in my practice 2	3identify situations in which the immunity standards presented may require further consideration in my practice 3	4identify situations in which the immunity standards presented may require further consideration in my practice 4	5 - Strongly Agreeidentify situations in which the immunity standards presented may require further consideration in my practice 5 - Strongly Agree

With #1 Rated as POOR and # 5 Rated EXCELLENT please evaluate Linda Bortell Psy.D. as to:

	1-=Poor	2	3	4	5 - Excellent
Level of Knowledge & expertise	1-=PoorLevel of Knowledge & expertise 1-=Poor	2Level of Knowledge & expertise 2	3Level of Knowledge & expertise 3	4Level of Knowledge & expertise 4	5 - ExcellentLevel of Knowledge & expertise 5 - Excellent
Teaching Ability	1-=PoorTeaching Ability 1-=Poor	2Teaching Ability 2	3Teaching Ability 3	4Teaching Ability 4	5 - ExcellentTeaching Ability 5 - Excellent
Ability to Maintain interest	1-=PoorAbility to Maintain interest 1-=Poor	2Ability to Maintain interest 2	3Ability to Maintain interest 3	4Ability to Maintain interest 4	5 - ExcellentAbility to Maintain interest 5 - Excellent
Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions	1-=PoorResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 1-=Poor	2Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 2	3Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 3	4Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 4	5 - ExcellentResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 5 - Excellent

With #1 Rated as POOR and # 5 Rated EXCELLENT please evaluate Faith Nouri, JD as to:

	1-=Poor	2	3	4	5 - Excellent
Level of Knowledge & expertise	1-=PoorLevel of Knowledge & expertise 1-=Poor	2Level of Knowledge & expertise 2	3Level of Knowledge & expertise 3	4Level of Knowledge & expertise 4	5 - ExcellentLevel of Knowledge & expertise 5 - Excellent
Teaching Ability	1-=PoorTeaching Ability 1-=Poor	2Teaching Ability 2	3Teaching Ability 3	4Teaching Ability 4	5 - ExcellentTeaching Ability 5 - Excellent
Ability to Maintain interest	1-=PoorAbility to Maintain interest 1-=Poor	2Ability to Maintain interest 2	3Ability to Maintain interest 3	4Ability to Maintain interest 4	5 - ExcellentAbility to Maintain interest 5 - Excellent
Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions	1-=PoorResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 1-=Poor	2Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 2	3Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 3	4Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 4	5 - ExcellentResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 5 - Excellent

With #1 Rated as POOR and # 5 Rated EXCELLENT please evaluate Merlyn Hernandez, CFLS as to:

	1-=Poor	2	3	4	5 - Excellent
Level of Knowledge & expertise	1-=PoorLevel of Knowledge & expertise 1-=Poor	2Level of Knowledge & expertise 2	3Level of Knowledge & expertise 3	4Level of Knowledge & expertise 4	5 - ExcellentLevel of Knowledge & expertise 5 - Excellent
Teaching Ability	1-=PoorTeaching Ability 1-=Poor	2Teaching Ability 2	3Teaching Ability 3	4Teaching Ability 4	5 - ExcellentTeaching Ability 5 - Excellent
Ability to Maintain interest	1-=PoorAbility to Maintain interest 1-=Poor	2Ability to Maintain interest 2	3Ability to Maintain interest 3	4Ability to Maintain interest 4	5 - ExcellentAbility to Maintain interest 5 - Excellent
Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions	1-=PoorResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 1-=Poor	2Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 2	3Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 3	4Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 4	5 - ExcellentResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 5 - Excellent

Attorneys, please answer the following (required by State Bar):

	YES	NO
Did this program meet your educational objectives?	YESDid this program meet your educational objectives? YES	NODid this program meet your educational objectives? NO
Did the course update or keep you informed of your legal reponsibilities?	YESDid the course update or keep you informed of your legal reponsibilities? YES	NODid the course update or keep you informed of your legal reponsibilities? NO
Did the activity contain significant professional content?	YESDid the activity contain significant professional content? YES	NODid the activity contain significant professional content? NO
Were you provided with substantive written materials?	YESWere you provided with substantive written materials? YES	NOWere you provided with substantive written materials? NO

Attorneys - please enter your Bar Number below

Please rate the written/visual materials presented, with #1 being POOR and #5 EXCELLENT

	1-=Poor	2	3	4	5 - Excellent
The materials were:	1-=PoorThe materials were: 1-=Poor	2The materials were: 2	3The materials were: 3	4The materials were: 4	5 - ExcellentThe materials were: 5 - Excellent

Please provide any comments about any part of the program, and ideas for improvement.

By typing my name in the box below, I certify that I did attend the sessions for which this evaluation form applies: *

First

Last

Submit