August 19, 2026 Webinar Evaluation – From Adversaries to Allies: Building Child-Focused Co-Parenting Through Temperament, Attachment and Cultural Strengths

Presented by Laura Lorber,JD | Aurisha Smolarski, LMFT | Sarah Romero Yetter, MA

Responses are confidential and your name/answers are not published. By entering your name below you are certifying that you personally attended the session. Emails are used for Continuing Education reports.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Required for Credit/Optional otherwise

Email - Only used for tracking; responses are confidential *

Professional Designation, e.g. JD, LCSW, PH.D. LMFT, etc.)

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following: After completing this session, I am able to:

	1-= Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5 - Strongly Agree
Apply early childhood mental health concepts of Temperament and Goodness-of-Fit/Parental Attunement.	1-= Strongly DisagreeApply early childhood mental health concepts of Temperament and Goodness-of-Fit/Parental Attunement. 1-= Strongly Disagree	2Apply early childhood mental health concepts of Temperament and Goodness-of-Fit/Parental Attunement. 2	3Apply early childhood mental health concepts of Temperament and Goodness-of-Fit/Parental Attunement. 3	4Apply early childhood mental health concepts of Temperament and Goodness-of-Fit/Parental Attunement. 4	5 - Strongly AgreeApply early childhood mental health concepts of Temperament and Goodness-of-Fit/Parental Attunement. 5 - Strongly Agree
Discuss Attachment Theory, and attachment-related communication patterns, and apply the "Five Steps to Secure Communication" framework to support clients in developing healthier relational dynamics.	1-= Strongly DisagreeDiscuss Attachment Theory, and attachment-related communication patterns, and apply the "Five Steps to Secure Communication" framework to support clients in developing healthier relational dynamics. 1-= Strongly Disagree	2Discuss Attachment Theory, and attachment-related communication patterns, and apply the "Five Steps to Secure Communication" framework to support clients in developing healthier relational dynamics. 2	3Discuss Attachment Theory, and attachment-related communication patterns, and apply the "Five Steps to Secure Communication" framework to support clients in developing healthier relational dynamics. 3	4Discuss Attachment Theory, and attachment-related communication patterns, and apply the "Five Steps to Secure Communication" framework to support clients in developing healthier relational dynamics. 4	5 - Strongly AgreeDiscuss Attachment Theory, and attachment-related communication patterns, and apply the "Five Steps to Secure Communication" framework to support clients in developing healthier relational dynamics. 5 - Strongly Agree
Apply non-traditional qualities that can be highlighted in culturally diverse families so that participants can help coparents recognize the unique qualities in each other and strengthen “Team Kiddo”.	1-= Strongly DisagreeApply non-traditional qualities that can be highlighted in culturally diverse families so that participants can help coparents recognize the unique qualities in each other and strengthen “Team Kiddo”. 1-= Strongly Disagree	2Apply non-traditional qualities that can be highlighted in culturally diverse families so that participants can help coparents recognize the unique qualities in each other and strengthen “Team Kiddo”. 2	3Apply non-traditional qualities that can be highlighted in culturally diverse families so that participants can help coparents recognize the unique qualities in each other and strengthen “Team Kiddo”. 3	4Apply non-traditional qualities that can be highlighted in culturally diverse families so that participants can help coparents recognize the unique qualities in each other and strengthen “Team Kiddo”. 4	5 - Strongly AgreeApply non-traditional qualities that can be highlighted in culturally diverse families so that participants can help coparents recognize the unique qualities in each other and strengthen “Team Kiddo”. 5 - Strongly Agree

With #1 Rated as POOR and # 5 Rated EXCELLENT please evaluate Laura Lorber,JD as to:

	1-=Poor	2	3	4	5 - Excellent
Level of Knowledge & expertise	1-=PoorLevel of Knowledge & expertise 1-=Poor	2Level of Knowledge & expertise 2	3Level of Knowledge & expertise 3	4Level of Knowledge & expertise 4	5 - ExcellentLevel of Knowledge & expertise 5 - Excellent
Teaching Ability	1-=PoorTeaching Ability 1-=Poor	2Teaching Ability 2	3Teaching Ability 3	4Teaching Ability 4	5 - ExcellentTeaching Ability 5 - Excellent
Ability to Maintain interest	1-=PoorAbility to Maintain interest 1-=Poor	2Ability to Maintain interest 2	3Ability to Maintain interest 3	4Ability to Maintain interest 4	5 - ExcellentAbility to Maintain interest 5 - Excellent
Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions	1-=PoorResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 1-=Poor	2Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 2	3Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 3	4Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 4	5 - ExcellentResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 5 - Excellent

With #1 Rated as POOR and # 5 Rated EXCELLENT please evaluate Aurisha Smolarski, LMFT as to:

	1-=Poor	2	3	4	5 - Excellent
Level of Knowledge & expertise	1-=PoorLevel of Knowledge & expertise 1-=Poor	2Level of Knowledge & expertise 2	3Level of Knowledge & expertise 3	4Level of Knowledge & expertise 4	5 - ExcellentLevel of Knowledge & expertise 5 - Excellent
Teaching Ability	1-=PoorTeaching Ability 1-=Poor	2Teaching Ability 2	3Teaching Ability 3	4Teaching Ability 4	5 - ExcellentTeaching Ability 5 - Excellent
Ability to Maintain interest	1-=PoorAbility to Maintain interest 1-=Poor	2Ability to Maintain interest 2	3Ability to Maintain interest 3	4Ability to Maintain interest 4	5 - ExcellentAbility to Maintain interest 5 - Excellent
Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions	1-=PoorResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 1-=Poor	2Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 2	3Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 3	4Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 4	5 - ExcellentResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 5 - Excellent

With #1 Rated as POOR and # 5 Rated EXCELLENT please evaluate Sarah Romero Yetter, MA as to:

	1-=Poor	2	3	4	5 - Excellent
Level of Knowledge & expertise	1-=PoorLevel of Knowledge & expertise 1-=Poor	2Level of Knowledge & expertise 2	3Level of Knowledge & expertise 3	4Level of Knowledge & expertise 4	5 - ExcellentLevel of Knowledge & expertise 5 - Excellent
Teaching Ability	1-=PoorTeaching Ability 1-=Poor	2Teaching Ability 2	3Teaching Ability 3	4Teaching Ability 4	5 - ExcellentTeaching Ability 5 - Excellent
Ability to Maintain interest	1-=PoorAbility to Maintain interest 1-=Poor	2Ability to Maintain interest 2	3Ability to Maintain interest 3	4Ability to Maintain interest 4	5 - ExcellentAbility to Maintain interest 5 - Excellent
Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions	1-=PoorResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 1-=Poor	2Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 2	3Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 3	4Responsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 4	5 - ExcellentResponsiveness to questions, comments & opinions 5 - Excellent

Attorneys, please answer the following (required by State Bar):

	YES	NO
Did this program meet your educational objectives?	YESDid this program meet your educational objectives? YES	NODid this program meet your educational objectives? NO
Did the course update or keep you informed of your legal reponsibilities?	YESDid the course update or keep you informed of your legal reponsibilities? YES	NODid the course update or keep you informed of your legal reponsibilities? NO
Did the activity contain significant professional content?	YESDid the activity contain significant professional content? YES	NODid the activity contain significant professional content? NO
Were you provided with substantive written materials?	YESWere you provided with substantive written materials? YES	NOWere you provided with substantive written materials? NO

Please rate the written/visual materials presented, with #1 being POOR and #5 EXCELLENT

	1-=Poor	2	3	4	5 - Excellent
The materials were:	1-=PoorThe materials were: 1-=Poor	2The materials were: 2	3The materials were: 3	4The materials were: 4	5 - ExcellentThe materials were: 5 - Excellent

Attorneys: Enter your Bar Number below:

Please provide any comments about any part of the program, and ideas for improvement.

By typing my name in the box below, I certify that I did attend the sessions for which this evaluation form applies: *

First

Last

Submit